Psychothérapeute Ecoute Analyse Conseil PNL Hypnose Management Communication Coaching Particulier Domicile et Entreprises

Duration : 0:0:30

I am a life skills coach working with at-risk youth. I would like to administer the ASVAB (Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery) test to many of my clients to aid them in determining their potential future success. Does anyone have any suggestions on where or how I can obtain a copy??

And no, many are not interested in joining the services, I just want to administer the test for the above reasons.

Not possible. When the test is given at large at high schools, recruiters are on site. The tests are collected and then graded. When I took my initial test in HS. the guidance counselor had the results, but then the calls started from the recruiters.

powered by Yahoo Answers

Lean Key est un cabinet indépendant et créatif ayant pour vocation l’amélioration de la performance des processus industriels et administratifs. Garant de réduction de coûts, Lean Key conseille, forme et accompagne ses clients dans le déploiement du Lean manufacturing et du Kaizen. Expert des méthodes à l’origine du succès de Toyota, Lean Key coach les sociétés dans leur Lean Transformation

Duration : 0:0:11

I m doing B.Sc. vocational II year.After this I want to do M.B.A. & I.A.S. /P.C.S. coaching both.Should I start prepration of both M.B.A. entrance test & I.A.S. /P.C.S. test from this year.
What should I do?
sorry I want to do M.C.A. not M.B.A.

Yes you should start studying from the earliest especially if you want to crack CAT and aspire to get into any premiere B-schools.

http://www.rootseducation.com/wheremba.h… site has a detailed explanation of the course,some guidelines to crack CAT or any other MBA competitive exams and complete list of top B schools.

powered by Yahoo Answers

Short video on vocation.You might want to read “48 days to the Work you Love” by life coach Dan Miller

Duration : 0:1:17

Hi everyone,
I am in a huge dilemma. I am 24 years old and I have been for the past 6 years after high school trying to figure out what i want to do with my life. Last year i decided i wanted to attend a vocational school in the US,Florida to be a personal trainer. I enjoyed the school so much that i have realized i want to study something like sports science. I live in Denmark where education is free however the only option i have here is a global bachelor in lifestyle coaching and fitness management. It is not exactly the field i want to study but it's okay. Now i saw that there are some universities in London that offers sports science degrees. But london is very expensive and it cost to go to school there.
Now this issue have stressed me out a lot lately. I have a few weeks to decide and I feel like the choice gets harder and harder.
What do you think i should chose? sports science in London? or global bachelor in Denmark?
And if i do decide London should I apply for februar even though i won't have that much money or should i wait til next year in september where i will be able to pay the tuition and have more money while im in school?

Other places in the UK offer sport's sciences you know. Go to the UCAS website.

I would advise you to do the degree you want as you will get a better grade from that.

Very few individuals will start in the Lent term (Feb), much better to begin in Sept with the other new freshers.

Have you got your heart set on London or on the Degree? really think about this.

powered by Yahoo Answers

Lean Key est un cabinet indépendant et créatif ayant pour vocation l’amélioration de la performance des processus industriels et administratifs. Garant de réduction de coûts, Lean Key conseille, forme et accompagne ses clients dans le déploiement du Lean manufacturing et du Kaizen. Expert des méthodes à l’origine du succès de Toyota, Lean Key coach les sociétés dans leur Lean Transformation

Duration : 0:1:24

Last week I went shopping in our small rural hometown, where my family has attended the same public schools since 1896. Without exception, all six generations of us — whether farmers, housewives, day laborers, business people, writers, lawyers, or educators — were given a good, competitive K-12 education.

But after a haircut, I noticed that the 20-something cashier could not count out change. The next day, at the electronic outlet store, another young clerk could not read — much less explain — the basic English of the buyer’s warranty. At the food market, I listened as a young couple argued over the price of a cut of tri-tip — unable to calculate the meat’s real value from its price per pound.

As another school year is set to get under way, it’s worth pondering where this epidemic of ignorance came from.

Our presidential candidates sense the danger of this dumbing down of American society and are arguing over the dismal status of contemporary education: poor graduation rates, weak test scores, and suspect literacy among the general population. Politicians warn that America’s edge in global research and productivity will disappear, and with it our high standard of living.

Yet the bleak statistics — whether a 70-percent high-school graduation rate as measured in a study a few years ago by the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, or poor math rankings in comparison with other industrial nations — come at a time when our schools inflate grades and often honor multiple valedictorians at high school graduation ceremonies. Aggregate state and federal education budgets are high. Too few A’s, too few top awards, and too little funding apparently don’t seem to be our real problems.

Of course, most critics agree that the root causes for our undereducated youth are not all the schools’ fault. Our present ambition to make every American youth college material — in a way our forefathers would have thought ludicrous — ensures that we will both fail in that utopian goal and lack enough literate Americans with critical vocational skills.

The disintegration of the American nuclear family is also at fault. Too many students don’t have two parents reminding them of the value of both abstract and practical learning.

What then can our elementary and secondary schools do, when many of their students’ problems begin at home or arise from our warped popular culture?

We should first scrap the popular therapeutic curriculum that in the scarce hours of the school day crams in sermons on race, class, gender, drugs, sex, self-esteem, or environmentalism. These are well-intentioned efforts to make a kinder and gentler generation more sensitive to our nation’s supposed past and present sins. But they only squeeze out far more important subjects.

The old approach to education saw things differently than we do. Education (“to lead out” or “to bring up”) was not defined as being “sensitive” to, or “correct” on, particular issues. It was instead the rational ability to make sense of the chaotic present through the abstract wisdom of the past.

So literature, history, math and science gave students plenty of facts, theorems, people, and dates to draw on. Then training in logic, language, and philosophy provided the tools to use and express that accumulated wisdom. Teachers usually did not care where all that training led their students politically — only that their pupils’ ideas and views were supported with facts and argued rationally.

What else can we do to restore such traditional learning before the United States loses it global primacy?

To encourage our best minds to become teachers, we should also change the qualifications for becoming one. Students should be able to pursue careers in teaching either by getting a standard teaching credential or by substituting a master’s degree in an academic subject. That way we will eventually end up with more instructors with real academic knowledge rather than prepped with theories about how to teach.

And once hired, K-12 teachers should accept that tenure has outlived its usefulness. Near-guaranteed lifelong employment has become an archaic institution that shields educators from answerability. And tenure has not ensured ideological diversity and independence. Nearly the exact opposite — a herd mentality — presides within many school faculties. Periodic and renewable contracts — with requirements, goals and incentives — would far better ensure teacher credibility and accountability.

Athletics, counseling and social activism may be desirable in schools. But they are not crucial. Our pay scales should reflect that reality. Our top classroom teachers should earn as much as — if not more than — administrators, bureaucrats, coaches, and advisers.

Liberal education of the type my farming grandfather got was the reason why the United States grew wealthy, free, and stable. But without it, the nation of his great-grandchildren will become poor, docile, and insecure.

First of all, you blame the teachers for the downfall of American education when in fact it is the administration and the school districts themselves who plan the curriculum. The teacher is completely taken out of the discission making. So please, please, please, learn the facts of the matter before you start pointing fingers at the teachers again. The No Child Left Behind program of testing is making the situation even worse. Again, the teachers had nothing to do with making this program and they have nothinig to do with it's curriculum. But they are forced to teach children how to take a test. That's not education. That's not teaching critical thinking. That's teaching them to memorize and that isn't education.
As soon as you raise the amount of money that are paid to teachers, you will attract the best and brightest minds to teaching. Why can't you people get that through your heads? Do the major corporations pay their engineers, scientists, doctors, computer analysts, financial analysts, designers, artists, and other professionals crappy wages like the school districts do? NO they don't. They pay the best because they want to attract the best people. They also offer them major perks and great health plans etc. Also, if you look at many public schools today, teachers are always having to study and mentor other teachers to improve their methods and their teaching abilities. I agree a good liberal education is the best type, but that's not what our kids are getting today and it isn't the teacher's fault and I wish you people would stop blaming the teachers.

powered by Yahoo Answers

Lean Key est un cabinet indépendant et créatif ayant pour vocation l’amélioration de la performance des processus industriels et administratifs. Garant de réduction de coûts, Lean Key conseille, forme et accompagne ses clients dans le déploiement du Lean manufacturing et du Kaizen. Expert des méthodes à l’origine du succès de Toyota, Lean Key coach les sociétés dans leur Lean Transformation

Duration : 0:6:37

Hello,
I am unemployed - have had a job for a number of years that didn't work out, because i don't get along with people (due to inability to 'read' people, social cues, etc.) It was sheer luck that i got the job in the first place……i am also a very very slow learner….but on an IQ test i would test normal.

Has anyone had experience with voc rehab - job coaches or assistance with job placement? If so, would i have a chance getting assistance, due to the fact that i do have an employment history?

p.s. i am a former special ed (emotionally disturbed class) student…but that was many years ago….

You likely wouldn't qualify for anything significant at this point. It's sad to say but most Voc Rehab is being restructured and for some reason they are serving the clients with the most severe disabilities first. Yes, it is a crazy thing to do. Most of their hardest cases will never, ever work independently, unlike their easiest clients, such as you. I would call them to find out if they have some assistance programs If not, contact the community college to see if they have something that would help you. You may be in a classroom with a person coming out of prison, but it would be some help developing your social skills.

powered by Yahoo Answers